Friday, August 3, 2012

Connective Dynamics: Fields of Connection and Wholeness



“…latest evidence from many disciplines—from neuroscience and biology to quantum physics—suggests that nature’s most basic drive is not competition, as classic evolutionary theory maintains, but wholeness….new research demonstrating that all living beings, have been hardwired to seek connection above virtually any other impulse—even at personal cost… ‘The individual’ is only the sum of an infinite number of inexactly defined parts, and the parts as we currently understand them are shifting and transforming at every moment…Nature’s most basic impulse is not a struggle for dominion but a constant and irrepressible drive for wholeness.” [Lynne McTaggert, The Bond]

What does what we’re learning about fields and wholeness mean for organizations? For communities?

More and more, it means changing the way we have operated, moving from just coordination among individuals to actively seeking to bring minds together to take advantage of that natural connection and opportunity for better solutions. 

When issues and challenges are very big [meta-challenges] or very new [emergent shifts], no one person has the whole solution.  We need the intelligence of the collective, the tapping of everyone’s brain and heart.  We need the whole for big projects, big solutions, big changes of heart, bigger ways of understanding our systems and our place in them.  That happens together—we can’t get there on our own.

For big things, we have to invite the whole consciously onto the field of connection and play.

Just this summer, we are becoming more fully aware, all of us, that the weather is changing, whether or not man has had anything to do with causing the change. The New York Times published an article last week about the stressors on aging infrastructure in the US from heat and storms; in another piece, the author noted that something like a third of the food-producing areas of the US are considered disaster areas because of drought conditions and crop loss.  Mindful responses to issues this large cannot be successfully addressed by one agency, company, or community. Sharing ideas, knowledge, and strengths is the only way through.  How do we effectively do that, inviting ourselves and one another onto a field of connection and consciousness?  Seeing ourselves as  part of it all and co-accountable for outcomes?

But, dealing with systemic and structural breakdowns needs greater coordination, shared knowledge, co-learning. We respond to big issues by showing up together on the field of connection, ready to roll up our sleeves.

Have you experienced that in your own life, in your own organization and around areas of passionate interest and concern? Where with focused group energy, you were able to transcend personal limitations, whether those were intellectual, emotional, or limits of perspective and scope? When you felt yourself connect up and solutions surfaced, perhaps solutions that had been unforeseen?

We are all dealing with these issues anyway. If quantum physics theorists are correct, we are connected up anyway. So, we can draw on that. We can connect up intentionally. We can invite our best intelligence to join together, knowing that we are smarter together, and the stakes are often very high.

There are lots of ways to facilitate this, but these are some basic elements of co-creating and connecting to fields:

--Multiplicity: the desire for multiplicity, an intention to gather greater knowledge through connecting stakeholders;
--Engagement: clear intention and invitation to include, an invitation to engage; an environment that facilitates thinking together
--Thinking Together: a process to attune to one another in dialogue and engage the purpose [those I-We-It connective dynamics again]
--Aligned Action and activation: the knowledge that solutions that can be acted on and ways to implement found, that sponsorship and resources can be  tapped.

We will be examining these META elements in greater detail over the next months as they are core to connective, collaborative, and collective process.

When intentional connections and field building don’t work so well and the invitation to the magic of collective intelligence does not occur, it’s usually at the level of engagement and intention where we have not done our prep work.

But if we do fully enter into the process of creating and nurturing fields of connection on behalf of topics of importance, we will notice our values begin to shift:

  • ·      We begin to value other perspectives and points of view, more than we value full agreement;
  • ·      We begin to value the transparency between us, more than our individual self-protective cocoons;
  • ·      We begin to value the wisdom available to us, and to put greater value on the collective rather than only individual good;
  • ·      We begin to value wholeness.

No comments:

Post a Comment